Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:38

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
I've written three books, but I haven't been able to promote them yet. What should I do?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Two different time scales could increase quantum clock accuracy exponentially - Phys.org
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sean Combs’ ex describes relationship marked by ‘manipulation’: ‘I couldn’t say no’ - NPR
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Bitcoin fans aren’t all sold on Trump’s meme coin - NBC News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why do Christians think voting for Trump is any better than voting for Kamala Harris?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.